AEH300 vs Other Brand: Real-World Humidification & Airflow Test

When you're shopping for a humidifier, it’s easy to get caught up in sleek designs, extra features, or brand names. But at the end of the day, what really matters is performance. A good humidifier should noticeably improve the air in your home, not just look nice on a shelf. Whether you're dealing with dry indoor air, seasonal changes, or looking for a device that also purifies the air, you need something that delivers reliable, consistent results.

To find out how the Airthereal AEH300 2-in-1 Air Purifier and Humidifier stacks up in everyday use, we put it to the test. We ran a side-by-side comparison against a similar product from another well-known brand, measuring both humidification performance and airflow output under controlled conditions.

Here’s what we found.

Test Conditions

The test was conducted in a semi-sealed indoor environment to simulate real home conditions:

  • Room Size: 50 m² (538 ft²)
  • Ceiling Height: 5 m (16.4 ft)
  • Initial Humidity: 30%
  • Ambient Temperature: 29 ± 1°C (84± 2°F)
  • Duration: 10 hours
  • Reference Standard: GB/T 23332-2018

Both devices were run simultaneously under the same conditions. We measured changes in relative humidity and airflow output over time to compare their performance.

Humidification Results

Time

AEH300

Other Brand

0h

30%

30%

1h

33%

32%

3h

40%

34%

5h

44%

36%

7h

47%

38%

10h

49%

40%

We monitored humidity levels at regular intervals. Here's what happened:

  • AEH300 increased the humidity from 30% to 49% within 10 hours—a total gain of 19%
  • The other brand only reached 40% humidity, gaining just 10% over the same period

AEH300 showed a consistent and steady increase in humidity every 30 minutes, while the competing brand began to plateau after the 5-hour mark.

Notably, AEH300 reached 40% humidity in just 3 hours, while the Other Brand required 7 full hours to reach the same level.

Airflow Performance

We also measured the airflow speed at the air outlet:

  • AEH300: 3.3 m/s
  • Other Brand: 1.4 m/s

Using standard conversion, AEH300 delivers approximately 70 CFM, compared to only 30 CFM from the Other Brand. This stronger airflow helps distribute moisture more efficiently across larger spaces, resulting in faster and more balanced humidification.

Key Takeaways

Feature

AEH300

Other Brand

Humidity Increase (after 10 hours)

+19%

+10%

Humidification Speed

Steady increase every 30 minutes

Slowed after 5 hours

Time to Reach 40% RH

3 hours

7 hours

Airflow Speed

3.3 m/s (~70 CFM)

1.4 m/s (~30 CFM)

Room Coverage

Ideal for larger rooms

Less effective in wide spaces

Conclusion

The AEH300 outperformed the competing product across all key measures. It increased humidity more effectively, delivered stronger and more consistent airflow, and reached target humidity levels much faster. These aren't just small differences; they reflect a real advantage in everyday use, especially for larger rooms or homes with persistently dry air.

While the other brand struggled to keep up after just a few hours, the AEH300 maintained a steady, reliable performance from start to finish. That kind of consistency matters when you're looking for comfort you can count on day after day.

If you're looking for a device that doesn’t just look good on a shelf but actually improves your air quality in a meaningful way, the Airthereal AEH300 is a smart, dependable choice. It combines solid engineering with thoughtful design to deliver cleaner, more comfortable air when and where you need it most.

Back to blog
Recent Post
AEH300 vs Other Brand: Real-World Humidification & Airflow Test
View More
Should I Run a Humidifier with My Air Conditioner?
View More
Spring Indoor Dust Solutions for Pet Owners and Allergy Sufferers
View More

Leave a comment